In Chen Jiaying’s view, Zhe Ke was a continuum in ancient Greece, but Zhe Ke called ancient Zhe Ke seeking to really seek a solvable world. This demand for solvable appeal requires a unified vision to cut the tangled historical world into a complete story. Because of its completion, people and gods can be connected with each other, and because of its completion, Zhe Ke in ancient Greece is not a special theory, but a concrete way of life, and individuals can live their lives safely and have rich meanings accordingly. Chen Jiaying dialect tells the story before it is meaningful or not, giving it completeness.
However, Zhe Ke, ancient Greece, is different from other nationalities in that it not only requires an explanation of the world body, but also attempts to explore the hidden structure hidden behind the phenomenon.
A kind of expression only makes sense in life, but language, especially Chen Jiaying, believed that philosophers had hoped to find the qualitative structure of the world. However, even if we found it, our expression would be distorted because of natural language limitations. Of course, when language was insufficient to bear this great trust, the ancient Greeks found another way to choose numerical language to redefine various basic concepts
This is an important step. On the one hand, it can construct universalism, on the other hand, it can measure externality by counting universality. Although this externality can ensure long-range promotion, it is at the cost of losing intuition and sensibility, and it is gradually drifting away from the world of common sense in this field.
Chen Jiaying explained the technical solution based on numerical language on the measurable dimension of things, which helps us to understand the exact structure of natural world, but it can’t replace the common sense solution, because it can’t touch many daily facts. On the contrary, although language can make short-distance push, it is always located in the form of life. Natural solution inherently contains directness, which is a kind of understanding of the surrounding things, including empathy, insight, intuition, sympathy and historical empathy. People are often unaware of it and are willing to know it well. Heisenberg must explain it according to natural language in the end.
Chen Jiaying’s recognition of numbers did establish a universal connection, but it destroyed another concept of unified connection, for example, it used to be condescending to heaven.
Earth, man and god are in their respective places, and the universe is smoothed out here by Newton. The concept of uniform limit is no longer specific about the difference. A world in which we live, love and die is replaced by a world in which quality can be felt.
When Newton finally finished writing the language pure number on behalf of modern scientists, Zhe Ke’s umbilical cord was completely broken at this time, and Zhe Ke parted ways. Austin compared this image to philosophy, which is like being in the center. After a while, the sun will be vigorous and wild, and it will throw away a part of itself like this and that. These specific subjects are as cold as planets, and they are quite regular, and they will eventually evolve to a distant and complete state.
In the world of the gods’ retirement, the once solid daily direct experience is scattered everywhere like mercury, and then it can be assembled into an individual meaning, which means that the loss of reflexivity also means the loss of meaning.
When reviewing the modern world of science and technology, humanistic knowledge and emotions can easily flood into romanticism, and Chen Jiaying, a poetic philosopher, will never return to the classical world. However, he always ensures that the sober law of linguists will not stay in the broad field of science and history, but will start with nuanced concept analysis, which makes the perspective of thinking mode more rooted and directed at the root.
In today’s China philosophers, Chen Jiaying has never been the best, but in the end, the most important ones are not the best, because Chen Jiaying has always lacked the awareness of keeping pace with the times, and even failed to respond to Yunwei’s mentality. Although he translated two western philosophers of the century, Heidegger’s research on Wittgenstein’s philosophy at the time, Chen Jiaying people are always cautious in thinking and writing. He prefers to go deep into the source and deepest part of western thought to have a secret conversation with the greatest human heart instead of dancing in the spotlight, which makes Chen Jiaying’s ideological style vigorous and profound.
Although Zhe Ke’s umbilical cord has been broken, a bigger hidden worry for philosophers is that they often turn a blind eye to it because of thousands of years of great ideological inertia. Wittgenstein said that philosophers often value the natural method and try to answer questions irresistibly. This tendency is rooted in form and truth. Then Wittgenstein said that Chen Jiaying believed that today’s philosophers no longer explain the world unification from hypothesis or attempt to say the future, but concentrate on concept investigation and core experience reflection. This kind of concept reflection requires philosophers to linger around the natural solution and it does not increase us.
It is an urgent task for every contemporary philosopher that Zhe Ke’s common sense re-develops this problem in the depth of language, but Chen Jiaying said in the preface that this is a piece of thinking in confusion, which is neither an end nor a conclusion. Perhaps this is the meaning of thought because it is always on the way.
8 years
exceed the time limit
In this era, everything will expire, canned pineapple will expire, feelings will expire, and the statute of limitations for prosecution in the Legislative Yuan will also expire.
On January 4th, 2006, Li Ao’s gas mask was on his head, and he spoke seriously to Taiwan legislators after Chen Jun’s purchase. Li Ao made a long-planned tear gas spray, and green camp legislators screamed and blew their noses and walked out, vowing to severely punish Master Li’s bad behavior. On January 5th, the case was transferred to the Disciplinary Committee, and it turned to March 3rd, 2007, that is, the last day of the three-month statute of limitations. Unexpectedly, two members of the Disciplinary Committee showed up and watched Li Ao’s success, and he spoke wildly to the camera. Who dared to provoke me, Master Li
According to the modern Chinese dictionary, the meaning of prescription can be extended at a certain time, which refers to the time limit for the effectiveness of criminal liability civil litigation stipulated by law.
Obviously, the function of prescription is to set a common standard for actions, but if they fail to respond or reach the expiration date, they must give up, give up and not entangle. However, canned pineapples will deteriorate after the expiration date, which will make a big fuss in the Legislative Yuan. A fact that has happened but will not change is still to set a prescription secret for things that have no expiration date, that is, to give up or forget the legalization of this line.
People are naturally good at the limitation of time, and what should be the limitation of time for criminal responsibility and civil litigation benefits? Legalists can easily cite a long list of reasonable and reasonable reasons. It is necessary to maintain stability and unity, save success, help crack down on existing criminal activities, and be efficient in handling affairs. Criminal cases can be prosecuted and legally abandoned in the name of limitation, let alone a political show in the era of mass democracy.
In Li Ao, the tear gas incident lasted for nearly half a year before and after the instant fast food throwing era. It’s a perfect thing to have another great escape, but we can’t rashly assert that the disciplinary Committee members who are absent from the meeting are completely cowards. In such a political show, they are losing ground because of losing the opportunity. It may be the wisest choice to know that the prescription for prosecution has expired. On the other hand, the prescription for speculation has expired. In this regard, the disciplinary Committee members who refuse to attend the meeting are giving up this round of game. The implication is this.
Restarting at any time is the greatest gospel that the mass media era brings to the entertainment stars of politicians. On whether a game is a complete failure or a complete crash, because the audience forgets so quickly, you can make a comeback at any time. A classic case recently was that Qu Meifeng was dormant for six years after the release of sex CDs. This woman chose to go back to the media to join a TV station and became a news anchor.
Milan Kundera tells a scene that people often see in the slow. When a person is walking on the road, he suddenly wants to recall something, and then he will slow down mechanically. On the contrary, he wants to forget something that has just happened, and he will unconsciously speed up his walking, as if he were going to hide quickly and still be close to him. Kundera concludes that the phenomenon implies the secret connection of the speed of thought. He sums up this connection in two mathematical equations: the speed of memory is directly proportional to the speed of forgetting, and the speed of forgetting is directly proportional to the speed of forgetting. Della said that from this equation, we can infer all kinds of things, compared with saying that our time is obsessed with the speed devil, and because of this, it is easy to be forgotten in this era. Of course, this assertion can be reversed, saying that our time is obsessed with the desire to forget and satisfy this desire, and it is obsessed with the speed devil.
Pierre bourdieu also reached the speed of thinking when he criticized the influence of visual media culture. He said that one of the main problems caused by visual media is the speed of thinking. Zygmont Bowman commented on this. This does not mean that people must think quickly when they are in front of visual media and reflect on comparative arguments. It is more important to say that in a fast world, when you pause to think before saying a sentence, you will get a special idea. This idea is a concept of low value. Everyone will not and need to think about ideas because they are not proved and they do not need to be proved like men.
Because people are good at forgetting, we have to forget everything. We are always ready to forget and give up the facts. This moment of preparation is an ardent expectation for change. When you are galloping on the expressway at 175 kilometers per hour, the only thing you can do is to be always ready for anti-static, which requires neither preparation nor time, because it is all the time.
Heraclitus said that everything in the phenomenal world is resident in modern people’s obsession with speed change shows that modern people are always used to staying in the phenomenal world. For modern people, change is noble and constant, but it is conservative, which can show this different attitude towards fast and slow motion and show the difference between ancient people and modern people.
In the history of western philosophy, Russell said that the Greeks were not addicted to the doctrine of the golden mean, either in their theory or in their practice. Heraclitus thought that everything was changing, but parmenides retorted that nothing was changing. Many of Russell’s remarks were so profound and biased that Heraclitus did advocate that everything was changing. It was his famous saying that one can’t step into the same river twice, but Heraclitus’s key point is the latter point. This change occurred according to the invariable law, so the difference between Heraclitus and parmenides was not as big as Russell said.
After parmenides gave birth to Zhi Nuo, there were four paradoxes that made ordinary people stunned. The most famous one was that Achilles, a famous long-distance runner in ancient Greece, couldn’t catch up with the tortoise. The basic idea was that he could run the fastest and never catch up with the slowest in the race. Because of catching up, he must first reach the point where he was chased, so that the slow running must always be a little ahead. This paradox seems a bit radical to modern people who are familiar with the limit concept, but we don’t want to show off our knowledge but try to understand the ancient Greek thoughts sympathetically. Then we will realize that Zhi Nuo’s good intentions are actually demonstrating his teacher’s
The superiority of stillness relative to movement in ontology will be mapped to ethics, so the ancient people thought that stillness was noble and movement was humble. This idea is natural here. It looks not like a philosophical concept but more like common sense. In Zhe Ke’s common sense, Chen Jiaying said that an object with a superior position at rest will be in its place without external interference. This is its natural state and a noble state. It is said that one of the reasons for Copernicus and Heliocentrism’s defense was that the sun was nobler than the earth, so it should be the sun but not the earth.
On the other hand, nobleness always shows stillness. Aristotle thinks that people are marked by having a lot of leisure, which means that they can enjoy leisure very well. Whenever driving on the Third Ring Road, which is similar to an open-air parking lot, I always have goodwill sympathy for those car owners who rush around and turn around and overtake and jam. These people keep fighting for speed because they don’t live because they don’t have the word leisure in their dictionary. Their schedules are all decided by other people’s customers, bosses or girlfriends. They don’t have leisure, and they are either giving up others or being given up by others.
